Lecture 2: Kratzer, Poole, Conditionals and Means-End Reasoning ESSLLI’16: Deontic modality: linguistic and logical perspectives on oughts and ends

نویسندگان

  • Cleo Condoravdi
  • Leon van der Torre
چکیده

The formal framework introduced by Kratzer in 1981 is closely related to the work on DSDL in the sixties and seventies, such as the work of Hansson and Lewis discussed in the handout of Lecture 1. Her semantics is therefore sometimes referred to as the Lewis-Kratzer semantics. In the semantics of Kratzer, the preference ordering is not given, but it is constructed from two sets of propositions, called the modal base and the ordering source. The modal base gives the set of worlds of the preference ordering, namely the worlds satisfying all the sentences of the modal base. The ordering source gives the preference relation between the worlds, namely the subset ordering on the sentences of the ordering source. When the sentences of the ordering source are taken as obligations, this represents that a maximal number of obligations is fulfilled, or a minimal number of them is violated. Conditional obligations are then evaluated as in DSDL.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Dynamic Thoughts on Ifs and Oughts

Iffy oughts figure prominently in a variety of paradoxes of deontic logic. A satisfying response to these paradoxes is a non-negotiable component of any adequate semantic story about conditionals and deontic modals. I demonstrate that such a story can be told but doing so requires that we supplement a semantics that pays proper attention to the sensitivity of ifs and oughts to contextual inform...

متن کامل

Chisholm's Paradox and Conditional Oughts

Since it was presented in 1963, Chisholm’s paradox has attracted constant attention in the deontic logic literature, but without the emergence of any definitive solution. We claim this is due to its having no single solution. The paradox actually presents many challenges to the formalization of deontic statements, including (1) context sensitivity of unconditional oughts, (2) formalizing condit...

متن کامل

Ten Problems of Deontic Logic and Normative Reasoning in Computer Science

The ESSLLI course presents and discusses ten problems of deontic logic and normative reasoning in computer science. Five of these problems have been taken from a list of ten philosophical problems in deontic logic discussed by Hansen, Pigozzi & van der Torre [39]: how to formally represent norms, how sets of norms may be revised and merged, how contrary-to-duty obligations can be appropriately ...

متن کامل

The Conditional in Mental Probability Logic

Since Störring’s [63] pioneering experiments on syllogistic reasoning at the beginning of last century, experimental psychology has investigated deductive reasoning in the framework of classical logic. The most prominent examples are the theories of mental models [27] and mental rules [8, 59]. A fragment of the model theory of classical logic is central to mental models. Likewise, a fragment of...

متن کامل

Evidence Sensitivity in Weak Necessity Deontic Modals

Kolodny and MacFarlane () have made a pioneering contribution to our understanding of how the interpretation of deontic modals can be sensitive to evidence and information. But integrating the discussion of informationsensitivity into the standard Kratzerian framework for modals suggests ways of capturing the relevant data without treating deontic modals as “informational modals” in their s...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016